A Blow to Democrats and Terrorists

Today the Democrat Party and the Iraqi terror organization suffered a severe setback: Al-Zarqawi was killed by US troops yesterday afternoon. This action will buoy the spirits of the American public, cast the Democrat’s defeatism into stark relief, and demonstrate that when in trouble one should never give up just because fatigue sets in. This is indeed a happy day and it is fortunate that this murderer was killed and not arrested. Imagine the nightmare of liberal law groups apologizing for Zarqawi’s behavior and defending him as a misunderstood leader of lawful insurgents. Ramsey Clark must be feeling left out this morning.

Ah, the ACLU’s disappointment is palpable; Tim Robbins and Sean Penn cannot believe that one of their heroes has departed the world stage. Who can they idolize? Well Castro, Chavez, and Vicente Fox are still around. This event gives everyone some breathing room, everyone except Osama Bin Laden he must be a little shaken. It can be imagined that even the Iranians will take a brief pause to consider the historical inevitability of their proposed actions.

The relief that will be felt will of course be short-lived, but it does give hope that an end can be achieved; the successful democratization of Iraq and other Arab nations. That cultural hatred may be overcome, that death and destruction don’t have to triumph over hope and love.

Surely even Ted Kennedy, John Murtha, Nancy Pelosi; Chuck Hegel et al. can understand these sentiments.

Tolerance

Tolerance is a virtue preached by many but observed by few.  Fundamentalists of any stripe are almost by definition intolerant, and their rationale is based mostly on fear.  Fundamentalist UFO observers will not tolerate nor consider another view; they are correct and that is that.  The same goes for liberal Hollywood, homophobic Baptists, narrow minded Roman Catholics, Islamic western haters, and in US politics nut cases on the right and left.

The terms used to describe the best courses of action include exterminate, eliminate, destroy, “death to,” and many others heard daily on chat shows and news programs.  So called intellectuals including Noam Chomsky, Thomas Friedman, are actually cowardly commentators with an ostrich-like approach to the world’s problems.  When Islam takes over things will change drastically and not for the better.

Can Islam overwhelm Western Civilization?  Of course it can and it is likely that it will if the liberal, progressive part of the nations continues their present behavior.  At least there will no longer be worries about Christian symbols in public buildings.  Everyone will either be a Muslim or dead.  There will be no question of gay marriage, pornography, elections, the only option for dissent will be whether Shia, Sunni, of Sufi is the mosque you attend.

Simply look around and make a note of each incident of intolerance you encounter or promote; was it helpful?

Kofi Anan A Thinking Man's Moron

I just finished reading Kofi Anan’s latest editorial in the Wall Street Journal.  Why the United States still tolerates such a man and such an organization is a mystery to me.  What he wrote is so cynically aimed at the US that one must gasp at the audacity.  He is a total hypocrite.

In the article he praises migration and puts its inevitability down to the establishment of national borders.  This of course is absurd.  Does he mean the have never been migrations until borders were established?  He goes on to extol the virtues of migration to the host countries that benefit greatly from the assimilation of the “irregular migrants.”  Is he referring to France, Germany, Britain, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Venezuela, Mexico; or just the United States of America?  The USA is virtually the only nation that assimilates newcomers so that by the second or third generation the home country is only a distant memory drawn from conversations with elders.

Kofi also mentions the benefits to the home country of the billions of dollars sent home.  This is probably closer to the mark as places like Mexico do little to stimulate an economy that will encourage those born there to stay there.  Oh yes Anan does mention the downside to the home country: the loss of skilled workers.  A more cynical attack on the rights of US citizens to determine their own laws in the area of immigration could not be made.  The article reads like a homily from Ted Kennedy’s staff.

Kofi Anan says that UN policy will encourage continued “irregular migration” though the receiving countries are unnamed, and that while no nation will be asked to give up its border sovereignty all nations will be encouraged to accept more migrants.  What a joke.

His concluding line is the ripest of all.  He contends that as long as there are borders there will be migration.  What genius wrote this for him, and how could he approve it?  From time immemorial migrations have occurred as the result of war, famine, pestilence, and many other causes.  The one thing that has never encouraged migration is the recognition by a tribe or group of people that a new border had been established and that it might be fun to violate it.